Thursday, 18 June 2009

  • Prop 9

    Since I am on a roll here with the controversial topics, I would like to discuss same sex marriage.  Can I just say I totally agree with California, people of the state should be allowed to decide who marries and who doesn't.  Makes sense to me.  But why limit it to gay people?  I propose a proposition nine.  A ban on all marriages unless approved by voters.

    Before you dismiss this idea out right, listen to how it would work. 

    Every couple who wants to marry, gay or straight must present their " case" before a carefully selected panel, made up of clergymen/women of all faiths, marriage counselors, psychiatrists, child rearing experts,  financial experts, a couple who has been married for 20 years or more, a gay couple who has been in a long term committed relationship for twenty years or more, and 10 random people representing all races and political beliefs. 

    Then the committee will give their recommendation to the public, with their findings and written explanations from each person as to how and why they came up with this decision.

    For example:  Couple A, lets call them Lisa and Jack.
     Jack has been married 3 times and two of his wives died " accidentally."  His last wife thinks he killed his former wives and claims he was physically and mentally abusive.  Jack has no job, and does not support or see his 10 children from his previous marriages.  Lisa is a crack ho and has lost custody of her 2 children from her former pimp.  


    Couple B, lets call them Tom and Mike. 
    Tom has been arrested for assault against Mike two times.  He has a job, but only makes $10.00 an hour and works part time.  Mike has been hospitalized for extreme depression and has attempted suicide several times.  Mike cannot hold down a job  for any length of time
    .   They do not plan on having any children and are currently seeing a counselor to work on their issues.

    Couple C, Mary and Jane:
      Mary and Jane have been in a committed relationship for ten years.  They have two children together, one from Mary's egg and one from Jane's.  They used the same donor for each child.  Mary has a great job and Jane is a stay at home mom.  They have built a solid nest egg and the children's teachers all report how bright and well adjusted the children are.  However, Mary did have a one night stand with her ex, during the first month of their relationship.  They worked it out and things have been fine since.

    Couple D:  Greg and Tina.
     Greg and Tina are both doctors and have been together for 5 years.  They do not want to have children as they are committed to their careers and feel kids would just get in the way.  They have been living together for the last three years of their relationship and it has been going well.

    Last but not least Couple E,  Abhay and Charu
     have only met a few times.  This would be an arranged marriage decided on by their parents when they were young children.  Abhay is an engineer and Charu is a computer programmer.  They would like to have a large family.

    They could even make it a reality game show type thing.  They could gong people they reject, like the old gong show.  ( I know, I am dating myself here).  This could really be big and I think it would cut down the divorce rate and actually REALLY preserve the sanctity of marriage, while  boosting the entertainment industry!  And we all know that's a plus!

    So what do you think?  Who do YOU think should be allowed to be married?  Play the game with me, it's not as easy as it looks. Will it be couple A?  You tell me, it's up to you who gets to be married and who doesn't.

    After this takes off, I think voters should also be able to decide who gets a divorce too. 

    How am I the only one to think of these great things?

Comments (39)

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.